President Obama’s costly solar power boondoggle

While President Obama and his family are vacationing, workers began installing solar panels on the roof of the White House, as the President committed to doing nearly three years ago. As some may remember, this isn’t the first time a President has ignored the public’s desire for less spending and lower deficits by moving to solar energy for the first family’s residence.  President Carter tried it the first time back in 1979.

President Reagan, actually caring about the peoples’ pocket-book rather than a feel good photo-op, removed those solar panels in 1986 because they were too expensive and didn’t work well.

Little has changed in the intervening years.  President Obama’s own Energy Information Agency predicts that electricity from solar cells will still cost nearly five times as much as electricity from conventional sources three years from now.   This confirms my analysis of the prospects of solar power from 2011.  But when you’re not paying for it, putting solar panels on the White House seems like a great idea. I only hope federal workers, contractors and the public remember this extravagance when the next round of budget cuts and furloughs come around.  What’s next? An electric Presidential limousine?

Comments (11)

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

  1. Lilian says:

    “this isn’t the first time a President has ignored the public’s desire for less spending and lower deficits by moving to solar energy for the first family’s residence.”

    That is just sad.

  2. Jack says:

    “President Reagan, actually caring about the peoples’ pocket-book rather than a feel good photo-op, removed those solar panels in 1986 because they were too expensive and didn’t work well.”

    Best President in last 50 Years hands down.

    http://sensitiveskinmagazine.com/wp-content/images/interposts/reagan.jpg

  3. Levin says:

    “President Obama’s own Energy Information Agency predicts that electricity from solar cells will still cost nearly five times as much as electricity from conventional sources three years from now.”
    The fact that the president is even trying this is ridiculous. History repeats itself i guess…

    • Lennon says:

      “But when you’re not paying for it, putting solar panels on the White House seems like a great idea. I only hope federal workers, contractors and the public remember this extravagance when the next round of budget cuts and furloughs come around. What’s next? An electric Presidential limousine?”

      Although the limousine would be cool, wasteful, but cool.

      • Terrel says:

        If it’s “cool,” then how wasteful is it exactly? Does the coolness make it any less wasteful?

  4. Terrel says:

    If the prices are still too high and the efficiency hasn’t yet offset the cost, then this doesn’t sound like a good idea.

  5. Tommy says:

    An electric Presidential limousine?

    – That would be epically disastrous!

  6. CRS says:

    If that photo is acurate, Obama has desecrated a national monument, much like what he has done to the economy and the constitution.

  7. heello.com says:

    Edward Fujimoto (manager of the Wellness Program) at the Castle hospital
    on a TV program where he explained this health hazard.

    It has up to 99 minute long grilling time for preparation of a variety food items.
    s your first time to cook outside with your Dutch oven.